« Arizona-Type Issues Hitting Brooklyn | Main | Counsel's Failure To Object To Enhancements Under Career Offender Guidelines And ACCA Found To Constitute Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341f417953ef0134862b4c5e970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Second Circuit Rules In High-Profile Financial Fraud Case On Issues Relating To Ex Post Facto Clause, Loss Calculations, And Acceptance Of Responsibility Points:

Comments

Herbert

The summary of the 2nd Circuit's ex post facto analysis provided above seems incorrect. Rather than conforming to the other circuits that have found no ex post facto problem with the application of the one-book rule "at least as applied to a series of similar offenses," the 2nd Circuit rests its analysis entirely on the operation of the one-book rule. The grouping rules, or similarity of offenses, is irrelevant to the analysis, as is evident in the majority's discussion and as is emphatically pressed in the dissent.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Email | RSS Feeds

Get Updates By Email

   Enter your email address:

Archives


www Blog

Links & Resources